“Why Study a Syphilis Novel?”: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Medicine at Austin College

“Why Study A Syphilis Novel?: Eugenics and the New Domestic Ideology in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s The Crux (1911)”

Randi Tanglen, Assistant Professor, Department of English, Austin College, Sherman, Texas

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

imgres

Yesterday afternoon Randi Tanglen, an Assistant Professor of English at Austin College in Sherman, Texas, discussed Charlotte Perkins Gilman, medicine, eugenic practices of nation building, and Gilman’s 1911 novel The Crux in a lecture that coincides with the college’s exhibition of “The Literature of Prescription”. Gilman is perhaps best known for her short story “The Yellow Wallpaper” (1892), which shed light on the detrimental effects of the rest cure treatment for neurasthenic women. Tanglen contextualized her lecture about the lesser known novel by beginning with “The Yellow Wallpaper” which is familiar to a wide and general audience.

Professor Tanglen explored the way in which Gilman is a troubling subject for scholars and feminists. Gilman was rediscovered and recovered by literary scholars in the 1970s as a feminist foremother, and “The Yellow Wallpaper” was quickly added to course syllabi and American literature anthologies. However, Gilman’s commitment to eugenic practices and her blatant racism make her canonization as an American feminist writer problemmatic, to say the least.

In yesterday’s lecture, Tanglen presented The Crux as a novel that demands that white women take up their duty as the morally and racially superior members of the race to regenerate the nation. However, in order to do this, the novel suggests, some social changes must take place. For instance, women must stop competing with one another in a marriage game that pits woman against woman for the honor to marry, not the best man, but whatever man is available. According to Gilman, the dynamic needs to be turned on its head–men should be competing for women–and women should be able to choose from a field of men, in order to secure the best possible mate in order to make strong, healthy, racially superior American babies. The Crux, more a lecture than a novel, admonishes male doctors for maintaining a veil of secrecy which protects men from having their sexual fitness made public. Women need to be educated about the realities of sexually transmitted diseases so that they can choose a healthy, clean mate and fulfill their nation-building destiny.

Professor Tanglen’s lecture is part of her an on-going project in which she explores the influence of the elder Catherine Beecher on her great-niece Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In particular, Tanglen links Beecher’s advocacy of Christian womanhood and motherhood in the service of millenialism in the U.S. to Gilman’s advocacy of motherhood in the service of American racial and cultural development.

The traveling exhibition, “The Literature of Prescription”, that is currently being displayed at Austin College will be there for the rest of the month. The National Library of Medicine on Gilman is a rich site, especially for students. Focusing on Gilman and “The Yellow Wallpaper” the exhibition does not, however, explore the very troubling racial implications of the Gilman corpus.

An American Tragedy: Birth Control and Abortion Protest Novel?

Note: This post contains a number of Proquest links. You will need to use your university proxy or have a Proquest log-in to view some of the links.

I recently read Theodore Dreiser’s An American Tragedy (1925) and I was struck by the fact that it read like a protest novel–not against the oppressive nature of capitalism and its attendant poverty and class-based social alienation–but as a protest novel about the deadly results of limited access to birth control and abortion. Of course, the murder that Clyde Griffiths commits in the novel is inexcusable. Clyde is obviously the main character of Dreiser’s novel, but one could argue that the book is equally about the plight of Roberta Alden. Roberta is really the tragic figure in the text. Thus, it leads the reader to question what the social context that leads to her demise?  How many murders, cases of manslaughter, or suicides have been committed with an unwanted pregnancy as the precipitating cause? Dreiser forces us to ask: how many women die because they are pregnant?

In 1906 Grace Brown was the victim of murder at the hands of Chester Gillette. That’s one. Dreiser based An American Tragedy on the real-life story of Gillette and Brown. Gillette died in the electric chair in 1908 for the murder of the pregnant Grace Brown.

Chester Gillette and Grace Brown. (From Herkimer County Historical Society)

A quick survey of newspaper articles from the period of the Gillette-Brown case turns up many articles in which restricted access to birth control or dangerous, illegal abortions appear to be a key factor in the death of a young woman. For instance, this story from 1871, when Alice Augusta Bowlsby died during an abortion in New York City. The “doctor” hid her dead body in a trunk and tried to send it to Chicago on a train.

Or this sad story from 1896 of a young Nanette Archibald who took her own life in New Jersey. While the cause for her distress was not officially determined, the suicide note sounds suspiciously like that of a pregnant girl with nowhere to turn: “I find out my terrible mistake and attempt to take my life by ending all my miseries. I have troubles that no one save one knows anything about”. Or this 1895 story about the murder trial of David Hannigan who is accused of killing Solomon Mann, his sister’s boyfriend. Mann, according to the New York Times article, “betrayed” Hannigan’s sister and counseled her to get a “criminal operation” from which she died. Mr. Hannigan first attempted to kill Mr. Mann two months earlier, when he was with Mr. Mann and his dying sister in her room. In March of 1895, Mr. Hannigan succeeded when he shot Mr. Mann dead on Forty-second Street.

When I conducted a cursory examination of literary scholarship on An American Tragedy and protest novels, I didn’t find anything. Obviously, I will continue to look for scholarship on this topic, but regardless, I think Dreiser’s novel might be an interesting addition to a course on the protest novel. If I were to teach it, I would want to contextualize An American Tragedy in the world of the 1920s when it was written, as opposed to the turn of the century when Chester Gillette murdered Grace Brown. While I don’t know a lot about the accessibility of birth control and abortions during that time, I know that my grandmother scared me straight with stories from her youth in the 1920s. In Nana’s tales from her youth plenty of high school girls (some of those girls were the “old ladies” who figured prominently in my childhood) became pregnant and had back-alley abortions that left them sterile. Or they married men they didn’t love and lived unhappily, or were thrown out of high school and then sent away by their parents, only to return with a new baby “brother” or “sister” that their parents raised as their own.

I just found a book that I hope to begin reading soon entitled: Making Marriage Modern: Women’s Sexuality from the Progressive Era to World War II (2009) by Christina Simmons. Perhaps this book will shed some light on the topic for me.

Sadly, one of the things that my rifling through newspapers and the internet turned up is that murder is one of, if not the, leading cause of death for pregnant women in this very day. As in the Gillette-Brown case, it is still perpetrated most commonly by the men who are responsible for the pregnancy.

We haven’t come very far.

A Question to the Reader: calling this novel a birth control and abortion protest novel just doesn’t seem right. It suggests a position in protest to birth control and abortion. What would be the correct description for this novel, if one were to frame it as a protest novel in the way that I am discussing?